Showing posts with label Tom Cruise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tom Cruise. Show all posts

Jul 24, 2018

Movie Review: M:I-2 (2000)


M:I-2 (as it was known in all advertising materials at the time, not as Mission: Impossible 2) is a 75 minute movie, but half of it is played in slow motion, so it fills out two full hours. At least it wasn’t longer. Scarves blow in slow motion, doves fly in slow motion, and lots and lots of things blow up in slow motion. Practically everything in this movie explodes at one point, and this being from that lamentable era circa the turn of the millennium when CG was everywhere, but had not yet been perfected, most of it explodes horribly into bright orange digital bits that offend the eye. Adhering helpfully to the doctrine of truth in advertising, all promotional materials for M:I-2 were colored that same unnatural orange—almost like a warning label. 


M:I-2 has very little to do with Brian De Palma’s Mission: Impossible (1996, review here). And that is by design. Producer and star Tom Cruise told director John Woo prior to filming that (according to Woo on the audio commentary), “there’s no need to connect to the first one, and no need to worry about the original TV series.” This bold strategy is both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it defined the film series for the first decade of its existence, and in particular it differentiated it from contemporary spy series like James Bond or Jack Ryan, both of which attempted a fairly uniform look and feel to define their respective brands, even as the lead actors changed. It gave the Mission: Impossible franchise a reputation as a director’s series, in stark contrast to 007 where at that point the producers very much still called the shots, and they tended to hire journeyman directors rather than auteurs. On the other hand, it made the series wildly uneven, and frustrating for fans both new (from the first film) and old (going back to either Bruce Geller’s original 1966-73 TV series, or else the 1988-90 revival series, both of which had starred Peter Graves).

Like Brian De Palma, John Woo was very much an auteur. He’d made his mark directing wildly stylized, gonzo Hong Kong action movies including out and out masterpieces like Bullet in the Head (1990) and The Killer (1989). Then he came to America and worked his way up all over again from generic Jean-Claude Van Damme fare (Hard Target) to lame but stylish mainstream action blockbusters (the unauthorized Thunderball remake Broken Arrow). In 2000 he was riding high, having just come off the one genuine masterpiece of his Hollywood period, Face/Off (1997). He was definitely an exciting choice to leave his mark on the still nascent Mission: Impossible film series… but ultimately proved a poor match.



Auteur directors are among the only things the first two Mission: Impossible movies have in common. Besides that, there are two common actors, Tom Cruise and Ving Rhames… though neither really seems like he’s even playing the same character as in the first film, despite having the same names. There are masks. There is a setpiece that involves dangling. There is the iconic Lalo Schifrin theme, though it’s barely used in the sequel. And then there’s a shared pedigree. Not so much Geller’s TV show, but Alfred Hitchcock movies. While De Palma’s film took its cue from the great director’s man-on-the-run movies like North By Northwest and Saboteur, Woo’s finds its starting point with To Catch a Thief and Notorious (both clearly big influences on the director’s career, both of which he had already mined to better effect in two different versions of Once A Thief).

We meet Ethan this time around on vacation. (Not to the strains of the Mission: Impossible theme, but to horrible late 90s "vacation music.") And what he does for relaxation might explain his seeming need to engage in impossible feats of derring-do in his career. He’s relaxing by climbing an enormous, intimidating rock face without any safety equipment. And he’s not rock climbing for fun like Captain Kirk & Co. rock climb for fun. He’s jumping from rock face to rock face, and risking death each time. When he finds himself dangling by one arm, instead of panicking like I would do, he grins like he’s loving this, twists himself around (a good opportunity to show off Cruise’s impressive biceps), and flips up onto the cliff. (Ethan does a lot of flipping in this movie.) A helicopter arrives and shoots a piton into the rock face next to him. He removes a pair of sunglasses form the hollow piton (really, really cool sunglasses—too cool), puts them on, and gets his mission briefing that way. And this scene demonstrates from the start what’s wrong with this movie as a Mission: Impossible movie. 


The classic mission briefing traditionally comes from an ordinary, everyday item in a normal urban or suburban setting. It’s the juxtaposition of the mundane with the exotic that makes these unexpected briefings fun. In the first film, it came via an in-flight movie—an experience any audience member can relate to. In this one it comes from a pair of wrap-around Oakleys stuffed inside a missile shot from a helicopter atop an insurmountable cliff. And instead of getting a classic briefing, the sunglasses basically just tell Ethan to go to Seville and recruit a civilian—a thief—named Nyah Nirdoff-Hall. Then he’ll get his real briefing in person. Oh, and of course the message will self-destruct in a matter of seconds, no matter how cool Cruise looks in the shades. He throws them at the camera and they burst into those uncanny orange digital flames that so many things will burst into throughout the movie, and those flames become the main titles. Needless to say, they’re not nearly as cool as the ones in the first film that paid homage to the TV series.


In Seville, the To Catch a Thief part of Ethan’s mission kicks in first. He glimpses Nyah (the beautiful Thandie Newton, not yet the caliber of actress she would mature into) across a dance floor where flamenco dancers promenade, and they lock eyes. It’s a good encounter, as Woo and composer Hans Zimmer work hard to make it something special with alternating film speeds (the slow motion hasn’t gotten old yet), and a music-only soundtrack. The track, “Seville,” is the diagetic sound of the music the dancers are dancing to, but with all other sounds faded out. Yet Cruise and Newton don’t dance—at least not physically. 


She disappears upstairs to rob the place, and he follows. He catches her trying to steal a necklace, but aids her instead of stopping her, flirting all the while with a huge grin on his face. (Cruise’s main acting techniques in this one are “grin” and “flip.”) They end up in a dry bathtub on top of each other, and it’s a fun, sexy scene—though a lot of the credit for that has to go to Newton’s amazing push-up bra. But before she can make off with the invaluable necklace she’s after, he (unbeknownst to her) spoils her score and sets off an alarm. Then he pretends like she’s his associate, testing the security of the villa (that old chestnut!), throwing her a lifeline and beginning her recruitment. He assumes she’s needed on the team for her skills as a thief, and he pitches her that way. But she still eludes him, driving off in an Audi convertible. He follows in a topless Porsche, and now they finally get to dance—in their respective sports cars.



As the cars “dance” with each other in some extremely dangerous driving along twisty, cliff-side roads (are there any other kind in spy movies?), Ethan continues to pitch her, speaking from car to car. I certainly respect the idea of Ethan’s recruitment pitch for Nyah coming from car to car during a high speed chase/race (even if GoldenEye had it first and executed it better—and nonverbally), but it’s impossible to believe they could hear each other over the engines of their open top Porsche and Audi! Then they start spinning out locked together and the soundtrack goes purely music again in “Nyah,” the movie’s signature tune, recalling the flamenco number that played when they first met. Again, the idea is cool, but the main problem is that now the slow motion is starting to get old… and we’re only twenty minutes in! And, frankly, instead of underscoring the grace of this automotive ballet, Zimmer’s slow, lusty, Latin-flavored dance music saps the scene of all energy. The romantic angle doesn’t work; this is a scene that requires pulse-pounding Schifrin material, and it’s nowhere to be found. Scored differently, I think I might love this scene. But as it stands, I do not. I feel like the combination of seduction and cars should make the seduction extra exciting, not make the car chase boring. (And seduction should never be boring to begin with! “Boring” and “romantic” are not the same.) 




Even Woo doesn’t seem convinced with his own execution, because he follows this scene up with a more traditional seduction scene (which shouldn’t be necessary if the car dance had achieved its goals), and Cruise, saddled with lines like, “Damn, you’re beautiful!” just isn’t as smooth as Pierce Brosnan always managed to be in such situations. I guess if you look like Cruise, it doesn’t really matter what you say. 


The reason the seduction is so important is because it’s setting up a Notorious relationship between the characters, echoing Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman’s oft-repeated handler/agent conflicted romance. Ethan thinks he’s recruiting Nyah for her skills as a thief (because his boss led him to believe that in the sunglasses briefing), but it turns out it’s because she’s the ex-girlfriend of the evil IMF turncoat who’s stolen a deadly virus called Chimera. Yes, they’re already repeating the IMF turncoat villain, right after Jon Voight’s evil Phelps in the first movie. This time it’s Sean Ambrose, who doubled Ethan on several assignments, and he’s played by Dougray Scott (briefly famous around the time of this movie for not being Wolverine). Ethan learns that Nyah is his ex when his boss breaks all IMF protocol and materializes in the flesh, rather than as a disembodied voice on a recording. And that flesh belongs to Anthony Hopkins (basically playing M), who instructs Ethan to use Nyah to get to Ambrose—a scenario Ethan is decidedly unhappy with, now that they’ve shared the magical automotive courtship ritual. The Hopkins exchange, unorthodox though it may be in IMF lore, does provide the film’s best line in this exchange:


“You mean it will be difficult?”


“Very.”


“Well, this is not Mission: Difficult, Mr. Hunt; it’s Mission: Impossible. Difficult should be a walk in the park for you.”


Besides that colorful bit, though, poor Hopkins must have felt embarrassed by some of the dialogue he’s saddled with (especially in a post-Basil Exposition world)—and by having to define the words he uses (“Her criminal record will be expunged… wiped out”) for the benefit of audiences to whom Woo gives zero credit.




The seduction and the Hopkins meet both take place in Seville against the backdrop of a Fire Festival. Officially it’s something about “burning their saints,” to hear Hopkins tell it, but for the sake of the movie (and Woo), it’s simply a Fire Festival. Which is the perfect setting for a movie where everything is flammable! And where style rules supremely over substance. 




From the fire festival, the film’s action moves to Australia, where it remains for the duration. (Seeing IMF agents in an Australian setting makes me think of the TV revival series that was shot there.) Ambrose has a house on Sydney Harbor where he lives with his gang of heavies (including Moulin Rouge’s Richard Roxburgh and Lost’s William Malpother—Cruise’s cousin), and the pharmaceutical company that manufactured Chimera is based there. Nyah is a virtual prisoner of Ambrose, briefly meeting Ethan (in one of the film’s best scenes) at a racetrack to pass on what she’s learned—and what she’s stolen. But in doing so, she compromises herself, and Ambrose confirms his suspicions by putting on an Ethan Hunt mask and tricking her. I’m not totally sure why she buys it, since in his utter disdain for subtlety, Woo has Cruise play the masked Ambrose as Evil Ethan, an evil smirk supplanting his usual mischievous grin, and an evil glint in his eyes replacing the regular sparkle. That’s too bad, because as written this was probably a fairly effective scene, underscoring the horror of your romantic partner being replaced by an unreliable doppelganger. 




The main problem with M:I-2 is that it’s not really a Mission: Impossible movie. Not remotely. Sure there’s an IMF team for support on hand in Sydney (Rhames back as Luthor, again handling tech, and John Polson as likable Aussie agent Billy Baird, a role he reprised in a video game but sadly never in another movie), but they don’t do anything very Impossible. All that is up to Tom Cruise. There’s no big con. Even when there is a con, pulled on pharmaceutical boss Brendan Gleeson (right out of a TV episode, in a nice touch), a masked Ethan is the only one involved! The best cons in both the show and the films involve all the team members. Woo does add a nice innovation to the masks, though. They’re now accompanied by little voice changing strips worn as stickers on the neck like Breathe-Rights for mimicking other people’s speech! That touch would remain part of the series mythology moving forward—about the only element of M:I-2 ever referenced in subsequent installments. 




Ambrose accurately assesses Ethan’s operational M.O., predicting (correctly) that “He’ll undoubtedly engage in some… aerobatic insanity… before he’ll risk harming a hair on a security guard’s head” when he, inevitably, breaks into the pharmaceutical company to destroy Chimera before Ambrose can get his hands on it. The big break-in plays like a poor retread of the CIA heist scene in the first film, right down to Hunt dangling in an ab-busting horizontal hanging position. Woo’s slow motion tricks (applied to a retracting cable) rob the scene of the real-time intensity of De Palma’s break-in. The whole heist then quickly devolves into a standard, slo-mo-happy John Woo shootout, something De Palma avoided altogether in his movie.




Zimmer’s score remains to date the weakest in the series, devolving into generic sounds during action and integrating world music (to generally better effect, barring that first car seduction) and generally terrible, of-the-moment pop songs at other times. He avoids Schifrin’s iconic theme for the most part, which is a shame because that theme arguably gives Cruise himself a run for his money as the franchise’s greatest asset. Its absence contributes greatly to this film not feeling like a Mission: Impossible movie. What I will say for Zimmer’s score is that it’s the perfect accompaniment to things catching on digital orange fire (and, I'll admit, real fire as well) in slow motion… so maybe it is ideal for this film, even if it’s far from ideal for the series. When the electric guitar-heavy arrangement of the theme does (sparingly) kick in, it should be more effective after all this deprivation, but surprisingly it doesn’t work that way coming over a decidedly lackluster action scene involving motorcycles, regular late 90s cars, a helicopter, and lots of slow motion fire. (I note the regularness of the cars because their extreme mundaneness makes it feel like an episode of late 90s television more than a mega-budget tent pole movie.) It doesn’t work at all. It doesn’t accentuate the action; somehow a theme that should work with just about any action instead seems to play counter to it, just so much background noise. The music is also enough of its era (like Eric Serra’s GoldenEye) that it combines with those regular 90s cars, that digital fire, and Woo’s already overused stylistic clichés to make M:I-2 feel far more dated than The World is not Enough or Die Another Day, the Bond films immediately bookending it. Viewed now, in fact, it’s hard to believe they’re even from the same era!




Almost as generic as Zimmer’s music, Robert Towne’s script is full of clichéd lines like “every hero needs a great villain” (repeated ad nauseum) and “You’ll stay alive! I’m not going to lose you!” (shouted by Cruise, rather than delivered), and their wretchedness is exacerbated by Woo’s overly earnest, utterly humorless direction, leaden with slow motion and artful audio dropouts. (Though his camera movement, at least, cannot be faulted, lending the film what little excitement it does manage to generate.)




The highly touted (at the time) Big Stunt, in which Ethan and Ambrose ride their motorcycles at one another and then jump off (in slow motion, of course), tackling each other in the air as the bikes supposedly collide and explode, plays now as ridiculous rather than cool. It doesn’t even make spatial or physical sense. We follow the two antagonists flying off (somehow to the side, even though their momentums were both forward), then cut back to the bikes, colliding and exploding in a whole different place, rather than directly under our combatants, as they logically should. (But of course that would kill them.) It’s stupid, and not in a cool way. Speaking of “cool,” Woo’s signature directorial flourishes, already clichés in Hollywood after being done to death previously in Hong Kong, reek of desperation (like Cruise’s Oakleys at the beginning) rather than the genuine cool they conveyed in the heyday of the director’s collaborations with Chow Yun Fat. His beloved doves may be mostly usurped by pigeons (perhaps they flew in from a John Glen Bond movie?), but their omnipresence during any explosions (or preceding Cruise into a room when a slow motion entrance is meant to be especially cool) quickly becomes laughable. Amidst the ubiquitous birds, Ethan does lots more flips (lots of flips, even when they're entirely uncalled for), all of them in slow motion. It seems like not a single action beat unfolds at normal speed. M:I-2 plays like a parody of a John Woo movie!




Woo doesn’t let up on the heavy-handed touches during breaks in the action, either, cutting to slow motion shots of an infected Nyah wandering around Sidney’s coastal cliffs looking to heroically kill herself (to avoid infecting others) as Lisa Gerrard wails wordlessly on the soundtrack. But that’s not enough. We also have to cut to a flashback of her selflessly injecting herself with the virus—as if we’d forgotten an event that occurred half an hour earlier. Honestly, Woo gives his audiences credit for nothing!




After a lot of punching in a mind-numbing machismo-fest fight on a beach between Cruise and Scott, Woo stages his version of a Sergio Leone gunfight at the finale… but of course it’s preposterously filled with slow motion shots of guns being kicked up into the air and caught. And the only reason that Ethan doesn’t get shot dead by Ambrose is because of the slow motion! Events unfold at normal speed for the handicapped Ambrose, but in slo-mo for Ethan, giving him the extra edge he needs to win the day. Instead of a battle of wits, the movie ends with a big, dumb fight on a beach. Adding insult to injury, audiences are finally subjected to Limp Bizcuit’s appalling vocals sung over Lalo Schifrin’s theme in the final moments of the credit crawl. (Though, to their credit, the band’s instrumental is pretty inspired and the wordless karaoke version is worth downloading.) It’s a bad end to a generally bad experience.


With five films to look back on now, this one doesn’t even feel like part of the same series as the others. It doesn’t feel like Cruise is playing the same character, it doesn’t feel like the IMF has the same mandate, and it doesn’t feel like the writers even tried to con the audience (in a good way), because they had so little respect for them and their abilities to follow that sort of narrative. (This may have been in response to criticism at the time that the first movie was too complex for its own good and difficult to follow… which it wasn’t.) M:I-2 is the entry you can safely skip in a franchise re-watch marathon, and be no worse off for doing so. On the bright side, the series could only go up from here!

The DVD and Blu-ray offer a few interesting features, including an alternate title sequence that’s slightly cooler than the one that they went with (but still not cool like the one in the first film or Rogue Nation). “Mission: Improbable” asks you to answer a simple trivia question about the movie in order to see the classic 2000 MTV Movie Awards bit where Ben Stiller plays Cruise’s stunt double “Tom Crooze.” This sketch is the best thing on the disc, and John Woo is the best part of the sketch, humorously summoning Stiller as, “Other Tom!” There’s a music video for Metallica’s “I Disappear,” the first (and superior) song to play over the end credits. The song doesn’t sound remotelyMission: Impossible,” but the video picks up the slack with Lars Ulrich getting chased by a biplane, James Hetfield outrunning a huge blast in a muscle car, and other spy-like situations. (It sort of reminds me of Duran Duran’s shabby spy integration in their “A View to a Kill” video, which I love.) Ironically, the video shows more self-restraint in its use of slow motion than the movie does! Finally, there’s a commentary with Woo, worth listening to for that revelation about not needing to tie in with the first movie or series.



"You and me both, buddy."

Mission Report

TV Moments: The fake virus con on McCloy (Gleeson), lots of mask business
Dangling: Straight copy of the first film, breaking into Biocyte, as well as some one-armed cliff-dangling at the beginning
Rogue Agents: The main villain, Sean Ambrose, who has his own IMF-style team
Rogue Ethan: Nope. For once, Hunt is a Company Man!
Fashion Alert: Ethan’s hairstyle, deplorably late 90s long and meticulously coiffed, seemingly for the sole purpose of volume when his head turns in slow motion... and his sunglasses, then the epitome of cool… for about six months.



Buy M:I-2 on Blu-ray on Amazon


Read my review of Mission: Impossible (1996) here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Seventh TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Sixth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fifth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fourth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Third TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Second TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The First TV Season here.

Jul 23, 2018

Movie Review: Mission: Impossible (1996)


NOTE: I had hoped to illustrate these movie reviews with lots of screen grabs, to make them match my TV season reviews, but my optical drive has failed me, so instead I'll make do with promotional material. Hopefully I'll have a chance to go back and add screen images in the future.

It took me about a decade to come around to accepting that Brian De Palma’s Mission: Impossible is actually quite a good spy movie. And twice that long to recognize that it’s even a pretty good Mission: Impossible movie. But when I first saw it in the theater my senior year of high school, I was just so incensed at the audacity of its major twist that I hated it for years. That twist (which I’m assuming is a spoiler to no one after 22 years) was making Jim Phelps, the hero of the TV show, the villain of the film. Granted, I had never even seen an episode of the classic 1966-73 series at that point, but I had seen and enjoyed episodes of the 1988-90 revival series, which also starred the great Peter Graves as team leader Jim Phelps. And I found the idea of making Phelps a traitor (even in the guise of a different actor) offensive and entirely unpalatable. And it still is, honestly, but as the subsequent film series has, over the years, both forged its own identity and simultaneously become more respectful of the TV series that spawned it (with direct references aplenty in 2011’s Ghost Protocol and 2015’s Rogue Nation), I’ve grown thicker skin as a fan. And the fact that in the film Phelps is played by the reptilian and generally charmless Jon Voight instead of the unflinchingly, endearingly earnest Graves definitely makes it easier to separate the two Phelpses. (I still wish, however, that one of the movies would include a cameo from a surviving star of the TV show reprising their role and explaining that somehow the Phelps who mentored Tom Cruise’s Ethan Hunt was not the same Phelps they knew and worked with. J.J. Abrams opened the door to such a possibility in 2009 when he suggested Graves himself might cameo in the next movie, but sadly the actor passed away before he had the chance to do that and rehabilitate his character.)

If one can manage to ignore the Phelps issue, however, Mission: Impossible is a highly entertaining movie, and a very rewarding one for spy fans. De Palma, who manages to be divisive even among his admirers (personally I find I tend to either love or hate his films), is, like Quentin Tarantino, a master of reappropriation. While he’s been accused of outright theft, I think that’s unfair. He takes scenes and situations he admires from classic films (and not little known ones, either; he blatantly borrows well-known imagery from the likes of Hitchcock, Antonioni, Kubrick, Coppola, and Eisenstein, among many others), and crafts them into something new, audacious, and often spectacular. He doesn’t just take imagery from these masters; he’s also studied their craft, and on a good day is right up there with Argento and Scorsese in his ability to construct epic cinematic setpieces worthy of Hitchcock. Mission: Impossible may owe its title, basic premise, and (most crucially) its theme music to its namesake television program, but the plot and central setpiece come from other spy and heist movies to which the director wishes to pay homage. And that makes it tremendous fun for fans of those genres. But despite the unforgiveable treatment of Jim Phelps, De Palma also pays homage to Bruce Gellar’s series.

The first act is pure Mission: Impossible, offering direct homage after direct homage to the show. The film begins with the tail end of an operation, and it’s clearly a classic Mission: Impossible con job incorporating several elements instantly familiar to fans of the show. Using a hotel room set of their own creation along with a life-like rubber mask and a staged death, the 1990s Impossible Missions Force (IMF) cons an enemy agent into revealing crucial intel. We then see them breaking down their set, an act that not only exposes the artifice of a good con, but also the artifice of cinema itself, recalling the final scene of Mario Bava’s classic horror movie Black Sabbath, in which the director keeps pulling back from a shot of Boris Karloff on horseback far enough to reveal that the actor is actually in a studio riding a fake horse, with crew members creating the illusion of movement through a forest. It may at first seem like a throwaway moment, but with this business, De Palma signals his intention to deconstruct the format of the series, as well as his commitment to cinematic sleight of hand. (A later scene reaffirms this with Cruise performing an actual magic trick for the other characters and the audience.)

Before that deconstruction comes, though, we’re treated to one more moment of pure, classic television Mission as the main titles unfold in a very familiar way to very familiar music. The TV series was somewhat unusual in cutting a new, unique opening credits montage for each episode, which teased actual scenes from the show you were about to watch with familiar graphics of a lit fuse burning down. De Palma crafts the same sort of opening for his film, showing bits and pieces of the movie to come set to composer Danny Elfman’s version of Lalo Schifrin’s iconic Mission: Impossible theme music.

Following the titles we’re treated to yet another familiar trope from the TV show, as Jim Phelps (Voight) is issued his orders via a recording hidden in an innocuous everyday item. (In this case it’s a personalized in-flight film selection, proffered by the complicit stewardess.) The voice is not Bob Johnson’s, but many of the phrases are: “Good morning, Jim…” “Your mission, should you choose to accept it…” and “This tape will self-destruct in five seconds.” We know the drill! From there, however, De Palma and screenwriters David Koepp (Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit), Steven Zaillian (Clear and Present Danger) and Robert Towne (who penned one of the greatest Man from U.N.C.L.E. episode "The Dove Affair" before going on to write such classics as Chinatown) serve up what the comfortably formulaic TV series never really gave us: an IMF mission gone horribly, deadly wrong.

The team (played in an act of calculated misdirection by recognizable actors who had been heavily played up in commercials and even “introduced” in a comic book promising fans their first look at the new IMF) is tasked with infiltrating a black tie embassy party in Prague, and securing a MacGuffin from a traitor named Golitsyn. (Yes, De Palma happily references real life spies as well as fictional ones.) It seems like a simple enough assignment for team members with familiar specialties, like electronics wiz Jack (Emilio Estevez), icy femme fatale Sarah (Kristin Scott Thomas, deliciously channeling Barbara Bain) and master of disguise “point man” Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise), among others. And it goes smoothly enough at first, but then, shockingly, team members start dying in grisly ways. Jim calls abort, but Ethan desperately tries to salvage the mission, only to end up impotently watching as all of his colleagues are killed, one by one, before his eyes. This includes Jim, who appears to be shot at point blank range and then fall off a bridge, and Jim’s wife, the beautiful Claire (Emmanuel Beart), whose car explodes. De Palma has given fans exactly what they want, and then pulled the rug out from under them quite excitingly. And he just keeps on tugging that rug when, later on, Jim is revealed to be still alive, and the architect of his own team’s demise. (Claire has also survived.) It’s classic Mission: Impossible… thoroughly and brutally deconstructed.

This is the moment when De Palma starts referencing what must be his favorite spy movie, the Robert Redford classic 3 Days of the Condor (1975). Ethan makes it to a pay phone and scrambles a secure connection, reporting in to his Langley control Kittridge (the then-ubiquitous Henry Czerny, of Clear and Present Danger) that (in Redford’s exact words), “They’re all dead.” Just as Redford’s CIA superiors set up a meeting for him that erupts in violence, so does Kittridge for Ethan. Since Ethan appears to be the only survivor of the mission gone awry, Kittridge is convinced he is the mole they were looking for. And Ethan realizes the whole mission was actually a mole hunt. After a very effective escape sequence involving hundreds of gallons of water gushing out in a restaurant, Ethan finds himself on the run like Redford… or like so many of the heroes of De Palma’s favorite director, Alfred Hitchcock. From here on in, what we get is more or less a Hitchcockian man-on-the-run movie, as Ethan desperately struggles to prove his innocence and safeguard the MacGuffin (again, in true Hitchcockian form)—a list of active non-official cover agents, or “NOC list.”*

But even if the plot is pure Hitchcock (by way of Condor), De Palma’s most famous appropriation (and the defining scene of the film in most viewers’ minds) comes from Jules Dassin’s 1964 heist classic Topkapi (based on Eric Ambler’s novel The Light of Day, and also an influence on Geller) in the form of a tour de force heist of CIA headquarters involving Ethan memorably dangling from the ceiling into a pressure-sensitive, climate-controlled vault. To aid him in this impossible mission, Ethan ends up forming the basis of a new team by recruiting disavowed agents Luther Strickle (Ving Rhames, then riding high on his breakout Pulp Fiction performance) and Krieger (Jean Reno, fresh from his international star-making turns for Luc Besson in Nikita and Leon) to join himself and Claire. Luther is a computer hacker in the vein of the original series’ tech whiz Barney Collier (Greg Morris), and Krieger is an all-purpose tough guy who flies helicopters and likes knifing people. The role as scripted seems to call for more of a Peter Lupus-type strongman (Willy on the TV show), as Krieger’s main function on the CIA heist is to deploy the rope from which Ethan dangles and to haul him back up (indeed, Krieger was drawn as a hulking muscle man in the Marvel prequel comic… but then again artist Rob Liefeld didn’t know how to draw men any other way), but Reno was the flavor of the moment and more than capable of a convincingly evil turn when the script calls for it. While not part of the de facto team, Vanessa Redgrave (Blow-Up) also deserves mention for a scene-stealing turn as an arms dealer named Max with a fascination for paradoxes and a seeming affinity for Ethan… if not trust. And she’s aided by Necros from The Living Daylights, actor Andreas Wisniewski, who makes the most of a small part with a large presence.

Like his “Odessa Steps” sequence copped from Battleship Potemkin in The Untouchables (a very high quality adaptation of a classic TV show), De Palma’s vault heist is an excellent example of how he masterfully reappropriates iconic scenes and makes them work in new contexts. The scene shows off Cruise’s trademark acumen for physical stuntwork (the dangle might not be from the heights of the Burj Khalifa or an airborne transport plane, but the acrobatics involved in remaining stiff as a board, parallel to the floor are very impressive—and clearly required abs of steel!) along with De Palma’s ability to craft ever-building suspense. Taking a page from another classic Dassin heist, in Rififi (1955), the whole enterprise must unfold in silence because alarms will go off if Ethan makes any sound. So the sequence plays out purely visually and generally free of dialogue.

After cleverly establishing the elaborate rules of the room via pre-lap voiceover as Cruise briefs his compatriots in advance, De Palma is able to ratchet up the tension with a close-up of a bead of sweat rolling down Ethan’s glasses from his forehead (will it hit the floor, setting off the alarms???) or a shot of a rat approaching Krieger as he lowers Ethan from the air vents above (will he sneeze again, setting off the alarms, or lose his grip on Ethan???). The director moves skillfully from wide shots establishing Ethan’s place in the space of this carefully controlled environment to close-ups of things like that bead of sweat or digital countdowns to create a nail-biting sequence. And true to the tenets of reappropriation rather than rip-off, everything taken from Dassin plays out within the context, once again, of a classic Geller IMF set-up. While the movie as a whole relies too heavily on a single protagonist for fans of the very much team-based series, the individual setpieces tend to highlight classic Mission: Impossible teamwork. Every member plays a role in the events at CIA headquarters, from Claire drugging the coffee of the man who’s meant to occupy the vault they’re invading, to Luther in the van looking at screens with moving green dots (as in Alien, these dots also signify suspense within the context of the scene) to Krieger struggling with Ethan’s weight on the other end of his rope. And upon executing their plan, they all make their getaway dressed as firefighters (recalling the show's first season episode "Memory") to the familiar strains of Lalo Schifrin’s original series cue “The Plot,” as reimagined by Danny Elfman. While utilizing generous bits of Schifrin throughout, Elfman’s terrific score also reinforces De Palma’s Hitchcock influence by channeling Bernard Herrman in equal measure. Furthermore, the timeless score helps the movie feel less dated today than its contemporary, GoldenEye, whose Eric Serra score places it as instantly and precisely in 1995 as the computer technology on display.

The only setpiece where De Palma really falters is in the final one, a chase atop the TGV train that involves a helicopter chasing the high-speed train into a tunnel. This sequence was heavily showcased in the film’s original advertising campaign, but even despite the great score it does feel a bit dated today thanks to the very sort of CGI the series now does its best to avoid (in favor of practical stunts), but which was such an irresistible new tool at the time that everyone was using it… even though the technology was still far from perfected. But unlike many of the subsequent movies in the film franchise, the action setpiece was not the film’s real climax. The complicated spy plot of betrayals and reversals plays out dramatically on board the train (such a classic genre setting!) prior to the wind tunnel flips and fighting. And, once again, it involves sleight of hand, both physically and in the filmmaking. De Palma relishes his reveals, and deploys them in his unfailingly cinematic style, with Cruise envisioning different scenarios that play out visually for the audience and in his head while verbally describing something entirely different for the benefit of his on-screen audience—a trick Christopher McQuarrie would revisit decades later in the series.

In Mission: Impossible, Brian De Palma crafted a pretty terrific spy film that manages to simultaneously embody and subvert many classic tropes of the genre. He didn’t limit himself to the tropes of the titular TV series alone, however, and for better or worse delivered a film that owes more overall to the classic spy films of Alfred Hitchcock and heist films of Jules Dassin. While that may rankle some dyed-in-the-wool fans of Bruce Geller’s series (and while I’ll personally never be able to fully get over the appalling treatment of the series lead Jim Phelps), what spy fan can resist classically canted angles of Prague streets at night, treffs in London safehouses, live drops on European trains, or intrigue at black tie embassy affairs? Not this one!


Mission Report
TV Moments: The firefighter disguises from "Memory," the opening credits, lots of mask business
Dangling: The definitive Hunt Dangle—right out of Topkapi
Rogue Agents: Phelps and his associates
Rogue Ethan: Ethan goes on the run when Kittridge accuses him of being the mole
Fashion Alert: One attribute Voight's Phelps shares with Graves is a fashion sense that dates somewhat poorly. It mostly comes through in his hair, which seems an odd length and cut for a secret agent.

*NOC lists as MacGuffins are a personal pet peeve of mine. I can’t stand that trope. From Mission: Impossible to Skyfall to Atomic Blonde (all movies I thoroughly enjoy), the NOC list MacGuffin drives me nuts. Because once a list of active agents is out of the hands of the agency controlling them for even a minute, all those agents must be assumed blown. The damage is done in the mere theft or disappearance of such a list from safe hands. It’s toothpaste that can never be put back in the tube, and thus an ineffective MacGuffin. The only way the CIA can really protect its blown assets now is by doing whatever it can to warn them and exfiltrate them in a timely manner. And an object that becomes instantly useless when removed from its proper place fails as a MacGuffin. In Mission: Impossible, at least, the audience can be sure that the real NOC list is never compromised, because we’re always privy to its whereabouts and the ineffectiveness of any attempt to upload it elsewhere. But Kittridge and the CIA don’t have the benefit of our omniscient point of view.

Read my review of M:I-2 (2000) here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Seventh TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Sixth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fifth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fourth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Third TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Second TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The First TV Season here.

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE Week

Over the nearly twelve years I've been writing this blog, I've written a lot about Mission: Impossible. It's one of the key spy brands, whether we're discussing the blockbuster Tom Cruise movies which have grossed nearly $2.8 billion collectively at the worldwide box office since 1996, Bruce Geller's original, innovative, and ahead of its time 1966-73 TV series, which established so many now familiar tropes of the spy genre, or Lalo Schifrin's indelible theme, a tune that connotes action and excitement and high-stakes espionage as readily as "The James Bond Theme."

CBS/Paramount released the first season DVD set just a few months after I began this blog, and I reviewed it in December 2006 here. Although I'd caught a few syndicated episodes randomly, the DVD sets afforded me my first opportunity to dive into the original series at any length. (My original introduction to the franchise had actually come from the 1988-90 revival series.) Over the next five years, those season sets formed a sort of backbone for this blog. As I noted in the conclusion to my review of the seventh and final season, "In many ways, this whole blog has been about my growth as a Mission: Impossible fan... Discovering new favorite spy series—and sharing those discoveries—is one of the main reasons I started this blog to begin with. And after watching all seven seasons, I can say categorically that Mission: Impossible is one of my favorites—probably my second favorite Sixties spy series after The Avengers." My reviews of each season became longer and longer, more profusely illustrated, and more and more in depth. They've proven to be among the most popular posts I've done. And yet, somehow, I've never gotten around to reviewing the Mission: Impossible movies. Sure, I've written about them a lot... covered their casting and production as news items, and included some of them on various best of the year and best of the decade lists. But I've never done in-depth reviews to compliment my reviews of the TV seasons. With Mission: Impossible - Fallout, the sixth movie in the big-screen incarnation of the franchise, due out this Thursday, what better time to finally rectify that oversight?

It's kind of amazing that Tom Cruise has been playing Ethan Hunt now for 22 years—far longer than any one actor continuously wore the mantle of 007, and longer even (by a year) than the cumulative period between Sean Connery's first and last (non-consecutive) appearances as James Bond. That's quite an accomplishment. And a reason why these films deserve further exploration on this blog!

It's also been a very long time since I've done a theme week, so "Mission: Impossible Week" is pretty exciting! Watch for my review of Brian De Palma's 1996 inaugural Mission later today, and others throughout the week, mixed in with other little Mission-related postings. And then see Mission: Impossible - Fallout in theaters this weekend! And while you're waiting (no doubt with bated breath!) for that first film review, why not whet your palettes by checking out or revisiting my reviews of the various TV seasons?

Read my review of Brian De Palma's Mission: Impossible (1996) here.
Read my review of John Woo's M:I-2 (2000) here.

Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Seventh TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Sixth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fifth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Fourth TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Third TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The Second TV Season here.
Read my review of Mission: Impossible: The First TV Season here.

May 22, 2018

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Character Posters and International Trailer

Paramount has released nine new character posters for Mission: Impossible - Fallout with a really great tagline: "Some missions are not a choice." They showcase series regulars like Simon Pegg and Ving Rhames, returnees from Mission: Impossible - Rogue Nation like Rebecca Ferguson and Sean Harris, and new faces like Vanessa Kirby and Angela Bassett. There's also an international trailer that's slightly different from the second domestic one we saw last week, offering some alternative footage and more of certain characters. Check it out.

xxx




May 16, 2018

Trailer: MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT

As promised, Paramount debuted the new trailer for Mission: Impossible - Fallout today. And it certainly looks like another winner! Will this be three great Missions in a row? Check out the trailer and judge for yourself.

May 15, 2018

New Poster and Trailer for MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT

Paramount has released a new poster for Tom Cruise's sixth Mission: Impossible movie, Mission: Impossible - Fallout. A new trailer will debut tomorrow. (If the waiting is killing you, you can still tide yourself over with the awesome first trailer!) Cruise once again stars as Ethan Hunt; the supporting cast including returnees Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames, Rebecca Ferguson, Alec Baldwin, Sean Harris, and Michelle Monaghan, and newcomers Angela Bassett, Vanessa Kirby, and Henry Cavill. (No Jeremy Renner this time around.)  Christopher McQuarrie, who helmed the last entry in the series, Rogue Nation, returns to direct. (A first for the series, which has historically used a different director for each film.)

Feb 4, 2018

MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE - FALLOUT Trailer



As promised, Paramount released the full trailer for Mission: Impossible - Fallout today, the sixth film in the series starring Tom Cruise. A cut-down version of it also aired during the Super Bowl. Rather unsurprisingly after two truly stellar franchise entries, it looks pretty awesome. I'm not sure it's possible to top the airplane stunt in the last movie, but this helicopter stuff looks pretty cool. I am a bit worried that this entry will be even more Cruise-centric after Rogue Nation and especially Ghost Protocol had made such great strides toward the team dynamic of the TV show, but with such a solid (and large) supporting cast including returnees Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames, Rebecca Ferguson, Alec Baldwin, Sean Harris, and Michelle Monaghan, and newcomers Angela Bassett, Vanessa Kirby, and Henry Cavill, perhaps that won't be the case.

I'm a little more concerned (probably without cause) about who the handcuffed man in the hospital bed is that Luther (Rhames) restrains Ethan (Cruise) from lunging at. Because it's clearly not any of the people mentioned above, yet it seems to be someone who means a lot to Ethan Hunt. And it looks... sort of... like Jon Voight. We can't see his face clearly and I could be completely wrong here, but if it is, then would mean director Christopher McQuarrie plans to revisit one of the most controversial chapters of the film series' history--and my own least favorite. Many fans of the TV series were appalled and insulted by the twist in the original 1996 movie revealing Voight's Jim Phelps (the character originated on television by the great Peter Graves), Ethan's mentor, to be a traitor. (I don't think it's really possible to spoil a 22-year-old movie. There's a statute of limitations on such things!) It took the film series three chapters to dig its way out of that whole for me. If they are re-treading that particular ground (and the trailer makes it very clear that this mission is all about the ghosts who haunt Hunt, among whom Phelps would likely be foremost), it could go one of two ways. Either it could undo the damage done in Brian DePalma's movie by revealing Voight's Phelps to be a different character from Graves' (the franchise is, after all, famous for its use of doubles and disguises)... or it could double down on it. If the latter, it's likely to be enough to make me hate the film. (Yes, that's a little irrational. I understand. But I love Graves and the show so much that I can't help it, even if I recognize it.) McQuarrie mentioned in a very insightful interview last May that he had re-watched the first Mission movie in preparation for this sixth one, so it's certainly possible that Phelps could have been on his mind when scripting it. Furthermore, producer J.J. Abrams has mooted the possibility of revisiting the Phelps betrayal in the past... though he considered it when Peter Graves was still alive, and had hoped to bring him into the film series. Sadly that opportunity is now past. So despite the apparently definitive death of the Movie Phelps in Mission: Impossible (1996), I do think it's at least a possibility we could see his return. And such a return would likely be enough to set Ethan on the wild course he seems to be taking in Fallout, based on the trailer. (We clearly see scenes of him going up against his own teammates, and even, apparently, teaming up with Syndicate baddie Solomon Lane.)

Yes, I know... this is a lot of speculation from me over a quick image of a man in profile chained to a hospital bed. But these are the things I fixate on.